If, then.
If biological macro-evolution is true, then people came from cavemen who came from mud, etc.
Then it follows that babies born in 2011 should be smarter, overall, than babies born in 2010.
And babies born in 2010 should be smarter than those born in 1960.
And babies born in 1960 should be smarter than those born in 1860.
And, certainly, babies born in 1860 must be smarter than those born in 860.
Is there any evidence for this assertion? Does it make any sense?
If babies are getting smarter and smarter, then so too must their mothers and fathers.
Now you know it makes no sense.
Honestly now.
Just Thinking: Those architects of the Great Pyramids, born over 4,000 years ago, must have really gotten super lucky to pull that off.
Take a test to see how you have evolved since you were born:
http://static.onemansblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/iqtest.swf